...
We don't call states in this sense. We continue a continuation ;-) I guess <map:continue continuation="{1}"/> is bad.
<map:continue src="{1}"/> or <map:continue id="{1}"/>
...
- rename "WebContinuation" to "FlowState", and accordingly "WebContinuationManager" to "FlowStateManager".
Yes, the Continuation represents a state, but to make a clear difference as a new concept, I think 'Continuation' is accurate. But 'Web..'?!
- rename "WebContinuation" to "Continuation", and accordingly "WebContinuationManager" to "ContinuationManager".
I guess I'm a little confused at the general agreement on this naming using "continuation". I thought I was hearing in Sylvain's original RT that continuations may not be the only implementation. I don't have a problem with any of the new names suggested which is why I'm not really adding anything to the discussion at this point, but I don't want to have the discussion miss this point.
Could someone who resonates with the vision for these other potential (non javascript-with-continuations) implementations of flow comment on this quickly? If it satisfies you, I have no personal objection.
Geoff
