Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > On 7 Nov 2003, at 13:52, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > >> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >> >>> >>> On Thursday, Nov 6, 2003, at 14:39 Europe/Rome, Vadim Gritsenko >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree with comments in this other thread that let's not introduce >>>> nested components in <map:call/>. Instead, if needed, let's >>>> introduce <act type="flow"/>. Sometime later. >>> >>> >>> -1 >> >> >> Your -1 means: "replace later with never", right? Just to remove any >> possible point of confusion :) > > yes. I am against the silly > > <xxx> > ... do something if true > </xx> > .. do something if false > > syntax. doesn't matter what the logic that drives the "xxx" tag is or > what "xxx" is remapped to.
Wow, that would rule out matchers as well. But it might make some sense since matchers are not all that different to actions ;-) Guido
