Is this even still a vote? It seems that it has devolved into a conversation. Perhaps a change in title will get more people in on the conversation--or perhaps turning it into an RT would help.
Being drakonian on messages with [VOTE] in the title will make it clear if we are still voting or not. I don't even know what the outcome of the vote was.
Guido Casper wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 7 Nov 2003, at 13:52, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On Thursday, Nov 6, 2003, at 14:39 Europe/Rome, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
I agree with comments in this other thread that let's not introduce nested components in <map:call/>. Instead, if needed, let's introduce <act type="flow"/>. Sometime later.
-1
Your -1 means: "replace later with never", right? Just to remove any possible point of confusion :)
yes. I am against the silly
<xxx> ... do something if true </xx> .. do something if false
syntax. doesn't matter what the logic that drives the "xxx" tag is or what "xxx" is remapped to.
Wow, that would rule out matchers as well. But it might make some sense since matchers are not all that different to actions ;-)
Guido
