Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > > Thinking further about it, I completely agree about that we have to many > blocks rigth now. But that is not an argument against adding more, > rather about removing or at least make optional, blocks that lacks > community support. You might remember > http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/BlockStatusPoll. > > We could add more blocks, but it has to be based on community interest > or involvement, not like some of the abandoned one man shows from our past. > With CoWarp and flow and jxtg we could think about removing (deprecating first of course) the authentication-fw and the session-fw block.
-- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
