Thank you, Xiangdong. Please follow up with the ASF GSoC lead regarding your specific experience to see what can be done, if anything, at this time.
Kind regards, Sally - - - Vice President Marketing & Publicity Vice President Sponsor Relations The Apache Software Foundation Tel +1 617 921 8656 | s...@apache.org On Wed, May 6, 2020, at 15:17, Xiangdong Huang wrote: > Hi Sally, > > > Unfortunately, we did not receive the anticipated response from the > > RocketMQ and IoTDB mentors before the deadline, and so the opportunity to > > participate wasn’t possible this year. > > I come from IoTDB community (and actually I propose some tasks about IoTDB > for GSoC2020 and they can be found on GSoc 2020 Ideas list). > > I know several persons leaving proposals under the issues but then I did not > receive any formal emails (from Google or some other formal organizations) > from Apri to now... > Maybe it is because IoTDB is just an incubating project and I have no > suitable permissions for mentoring that... > > I do not know why RocketMQ community did not have responses as they are TLP > and it seems the idea presenters are IPMC (who can be mentors I think..), > like @vongosl...@apache.org . > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > Apache IoTDB incubating PPMC > > Sally Khudairi <s...@apache.org> 于2020年5月6日周三 下午11:44写道： >> Hello ComDev-ers --per below, we've had a query on GSoC. >> >> I responded to Jack in coordination with Maxim Solodovnik, who is this >> year's GSoC lead. >> >> Please let me know if there's a dedicated mailing list or additional emails >> that I should be sharing this with. >> >> Kind regards, >> Sally >> >> - - - >> Vice President Marketing & Publicity >> Vice President Sponsor Relations >> The Apache Software Foundation >> >> Tel +1 617 921 8656 | s...@apache.org >> >> >> ----- Original message ----- >> From: Sally Khudairi <s...@apache.org> >> To: Jack Tsai <jack870...@outlook.com>, ASF Marketing & Publicity >> <pr...@apache.org>, ASF Secretary <secret...@apache.org>, Apache Security >> Team <secur...@apache.org>, "webmas...@apache.org" <webmas...@apache.org>, >> "apa...@apache.org" <apa...@apache.org> >> Subject: Re: The Problem about GSoC 2020 >> Date: Wednesday, May 06, 2020 11:20 >> >> Hello Jack --thank you for your message. >> >> Unfortunately, we did not receive the anticipated response from the >> RocketMQ and IoTDB mentors before the deadline, and so the opportunity to >> participate wasn’t possible this year. >> >> This was an unfortunate situation. As contributors to Apache projects are >> all volunteers, at times individuals are not able to follow through on some >> activities as anticipated. >> >> We are aiming to improve our communication processes regarding GSoC, and >> appreciate your patience. We also hope that you will be able to apply for >> future editions of GSoC with the ASF. >> >> Thank you in advance for your understanding! >> >> Kind regards, >> Sally >> >> - - - >> Vice President Marketing & Publicity >> Vice President Sponsor Relations >> The Apache Software Foundation >> >> Tel +1 617 921 8656 | s...@apache.org >> >> >> On Wed, May 6, 2020, at 05:45, Jack Tsai wrote: >> > >> > Hi sir, >> > >> >> > I was the student and a committer who had applied to GSoC 2020, who also >> the one selecting the Apache RocketMQ as the topic. I have seen the result >> now and got a bit confused. >> >> > >> >> > I was wondering why the projects RocketMQ and IoTDB which had proposed >> such a large amount of ideas but did not get even one slot for this program. >> I had started to follow every project’s mailing lists which announced to >> participate GSoC from the beginning of February. >> >> > >> >> > I had viewed almost every proposal which had publicly sent to each >> community for reviewing, which there did have some really great and detailed >> (comparing structure, implementation plan, development details to others) >> proposals sent to RocketMQ and IoTDB mailing lists. I cannot think of a >> reason why there is not even a slot for those two communities this year. >> >> > >> >> > Although I shouldn’t say those words as a participant who did not get >> selected, but I still want to know if there is a reason of the result. >> >> > >> >> > I have sent to multiple email address for nontechnical issue, if some of >> you have seen this, please forward to the one in charge. Appreciate it. >> >> > >> >> > Best regards, >> >> > Jack Tsai >> >>
