I wonder if we should also consider CB-12499 to be breaking, considering
that Default.rd.xml triggers the test failure on AppVeyor.
All tests are enabled now right? Or am I mistaken?
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Jan Piotrowski <piotrow...@gmail.com>
> All that change existing functionality a user could depend on.
> In this case:
> Possibly also the ones disabling the tests (which happened before that one,
> otherwise this would have been caught)
> 2018-02-08 17:06 GMT+01:00 Chris Brody <chris.br...@gmail.com>:
> > Can someone explain exactly which changes in the master branch should be
> > considered "breaking"?