sure - IF we want to rename then with 2.0. But before I give my whatever
vote, I would like to know which advantages you expect to get with a rename
.... as of now - I can only think of negative aspects ...

On 30 October 2014 16:08, Jason Smith <jason.h.sm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Love it. Get away from the WhateverDB thing. Just stake out an arbitrary
> mark from which we build clear, unambiguous IP.
>
> My proposal (as long as we are brainstorming names):
>
>     Eight Ball
>
> Tagline: Whatever you do. Don't get more eight ball!
>
> More seriously, yes, a name change has lots of problems. But it is worth
> re-considering Noah's point that now is the best time to do it, if it is to
> be done.
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I've been wanting to rename it SleepyDB for a while now. (cf. Max
> > Ogden's SLEEP protocol.)
> >
> > On 30 October 2014 11:43, Kevin Coombes <kevin.r.coom...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Definitely -1 on changing the name. It's already "cooked" into
> everything
> > > associated with the project. There are links (and hard copy references)
> > to
> > > the name and the web site(s) all over the place. How long do you want
> to
> > be
> > > forced to maintain DNS or HTTP entries to forward users from the
> current
> > > names to whatever you might pick for new ones?
> > >
> > > I would be perfectly happy to see a new logo however. And the last
> time I
> > > looked, there were a lot more colors than just red or blue....
> > >
> > >   Kevin
> > > On Oct 30, 2014 6:11 AM, "Brad Noble" <br...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> *SyncDB*
> > >> The database that syncs.
> > >>
> > >> Logo would embody that idea.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [image: Inactive hide details for Jason Smith ---10/30/2014 04:40:26
> > >> AM---On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache
> > ]Jason
> > >> Smith ---10/30/2014 04:40:26 AM---On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:52 AM,
> Noah
> > >> Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: > Blue is nice. :) But the
> > >>
> > >> From: Jason Smith <jason.h.sm...@gmail.com>
> > >> To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
> > >> Date: 10/30/2014 04:40 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Improved CouchDB logo
> > >> ------------------------------
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Blue is nice. :) But then that tempts me to change the name too. I
> > >> > mean, if we're ever going to do this, now is the time. It's
> important
> > >> > to note though that we have a very STRONG brand, and changing it in
> a
> > >> > big will be expensive.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Change the name! Change the name!
> > >>
> > >> Like all transitions, it seems scary. But once it's done we will all
> > wonder
> > >> what we were so worried about.
> > >>
> > >> The brand is strong, but the question is, how much of that strength
> can
> > we
> > >> keep, and how much do we lose.
> > >>
> > >> I think we will keep nearly all of it, plus we will get tons of
> > attention
> > >> with a 2.0 release and name change. And as if that already isn't
> > enough, we
> > >> get the opportunity to walk away from a ton of branding baggage and
> > >> trademark problems.
> > >>
> > >> Change the name!
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Noah Slater
> > https://twitter.com/nslater
> >
>



-- 
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!

GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588

 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc

Reply via email to