On 2019/06/29 14:47:05, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If it turns out there are some entities that are ok with the money they
> donated to the ASF going to Outreachy but for some reason can't directly
> donate to Outreachy, I would hope that we would make it clear that this
> workflow is not our recommended workflow but we would redirect some of their
> money to Outreachy and either let Outreachy pick which ASF project gets an
> intern, or can we document somewhere that this money was donated "on behalf
> of Entity X".
>
IMO, for the above, our response should be “Sorry, but we cannot accept
targeted funds for Outreachy because that violates Apache’s policy of not
paying for project development”.
We sometimes just need to recall that “thanks, but no thanks” is a perfectly
acceptable response.
