On 6/30/19, 4:02 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[email protected]> wrote:

    the fact that we will orchestrating and directing the spending
    of the funds from the beginning to the end

I am still not understanding why having an entity provide money directly to 
Outreachy is "orchestrating and directing the spending of the funds from the 
beginning to the end" in a way that is unprecedented and/or harmful.  IMO, 
everyone contributing to the ASF should be trying to influence other entities 
to financially support the projects they care about.  Unless you have signing 
authority, or organizational authority over the signing authority, I don't get 
how you can be "directing the spending" instead of just lobbying/influencing.

Maybe we need to drill down on that first.

Thanks,
-Alex

Reply via email to