> > Let me quickly jump in and say that the idea of a BoF session in > Minneapolis is not intended to exclude any other offline async > discussions or brainstorming that we do. The primary purpose would be > visibility for the EDI community and getting more people involved with a > physical presence, utilizing the benefits of a physical meeting. > > We can and should definitely have discussions and meetings prior to > this, both on this mailing list, and hopefully through online roundtable > sessions where we can flesh out ideas and principles prior to any > physical presence at any conference. >
ACK - that's what I thought and understood as well, just the "Reboot" suggested that this will be the point in time (and space actually) where we press the button and start seriously doing stuff :) . So I just wanted to clarify it :) > I have listed three general ideas for getting things started, and I > welcome even more ideas with an open heart and mind. Perhaps this is a > topic that is better off separated into a "communications strategy" > document of its own? Would anyone be willing to help with that? > I would but not leading nor spending more than review, comments suggestions, occasional meetings - more dragged into this than leading any efforts. Not after Airflow 3 is out. I foresee a LOT of energy and focus of mine (and the whole Airflow community) will be very, very laser-like in the next 2-3 months, and I also already have 4 security / airflow related events planned for me to go to in the coming 4 months (2 in US, 1 in Poland one in Germany) where I either speak or MC the conference. But I expect that to subside afterwards. I consider The fall events should be much lighter - CoC as a lightweight load despite leading two tracks and mentoring in a third one and Airflow Summit is pretty much on auto-pilot thanks to Software Guru) and I will be happy to spend more time then. So if you look for a follower that might turn into one of the leaders later, count me in.
