The board needs a list of the PMC members, not necessarily committers, although 
it is unusual that a podling will become a TLP with committers who aren’t PMC 
members.

Ralph

> On Dec 15, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> HI Daniel,
> 
> the graduation resolution is a formal text that has to be submitted to the
> ASF Board to communicate the graduation of the podling. Further information
> at
> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#submission_of_the_resolution_to_the_board
> 
> It has to be drafted internally, voted first by the PPMC and secondly by
> the IPMC (not that different than voting a release).
> 
> The text is pretty standard. The two main things to decide are: 1) who is
> going to be the Freemarker VP 2) list of committed to the new TLP
> 
> I drafted one in the past
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/marmotta/graduation/resolution.txt than we
> can use as an example for moving forward with this.
> 
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I would like to revie this thread.
>> 
>> Again, I would like to encourage others to check if we miss some
>> formal requirements, other than the VOTE thread here. I bet there are
>> some little things at least.
>> 
>> Also https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html talks about
>> things like propose a "resolution" general incubator list before a
>> VOTE, etc. (OFBiz is brough up as a good example there.) Anyone
>> intends to tackle these?
>> 
>> 
>> Wednesday, November 8, 2017, 1:34:24 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> 
>>> So, we have released 2.3.27, and has changed the domain of the home
>>> page (not of try.freemarker.org though... is that a problem?). What's
>>> next? Anyone?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Monday, October 23, 2017, 3:18:54 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:04:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 for the migration.
>>>>> And right after that I think we should start the graduation process.
>>>> 
>>>> Agreed regarding graduation. (We certainly should release 2.3.27
>>>> before that, but it's very close anyway, hopefully.)
>>>> 
>>>> Related:
>>>> 
>>>> -
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/
>> Apache+FreeMarker+Project+Maturity+Model
>>>> 
>>>> - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html:
>>>>  Here some dates are year only.
>>>> 
>>>> - https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker:
>>>>  This has some glitches, like it states "No Release Yet/Binary has
>>>>  licensing issues"... will have to update this somehow.
>>>> 
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up
>> again
>>>>>> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now.
>> Also
>>>>>> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>> Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), also
>> I hear
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that starting from October they want to show warning in
>> Chrome if
>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page
>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October.
>>>>>>>>>>>> That would be great, thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do it
>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>>> But I should be able to start this week, most likely Monday...
>>>>>>>>>> No problem, and thanks for keep us informed!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be
>> available
>>>>>> before November
>>>>>>>>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far all
>> seems
>>>>>> OK :)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our site, so
>> no
>>>>>>>> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, for
>> now.)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the checking the release!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I should also point out that in the last board report the issue of
>>>>>>> freemarker not yet having an apache.org <http://apache.org/> web
>>>>>>> site came up. I would suggest that the project make that transition
>>>>>>> sooner than later if graduation is desired.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel Dekany
>> 
>> 


Reply via email to