The very next steps should be: 1) run a vote in this list to make sure the community is happy to graduate; see "Community Graduation Vote" [*] 2) when the vote #1 starts, send an email to the Incubator general list to inform them that the vote is running I suggest to perform them now.
Then the next steps will be (assuming the vote has passed): 3) prepare the graduation proposal; see "Preparing a Charter" [**] 4) send the proposal to the Incubator general list for review before the vote 5) start the graduation vote in the Incubator general list; see "The Recommendation Vote" [***] Then (if the recommendation vote will be successful) we will submit the resolution to the Board. Regards, Jacopo [*] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community_graduation_vote [**] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#preparing_a_charter [***] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#the_recommendation_vote On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > Right. Sorry for the confusion. When I said "committed" I wanted to say > people engadget with the project after graduation, so PMC members in short. > > I believe Daniel already got this list pretty clear. > > On Dec 16, 2017 14:07, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > > The board needs a list of the PMC members, not necessarily committers, > > although it is unusual that a podling will become a TLP with committers > who > > aren’t PMC members. > > > > Ralph > > > > > On Dec 15, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > HI Daniel, > > > > > > the graduation resolution is a formal text that has to be submitted to > > the > > > ASF Board to communicate the graduation of the podling. Further > > information > > > at > > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html# > > submission_of_the_resolution_to_the_board > > > > > > It has to be drafted internally, voted first by the PPMC and secondly > by > > > the IPMC (not that different than voting a release). > > > > > > The text is pretty standard. The two main things to decide are: 1) who > is > > > going to be the Freemarker VP 2) list of committed to the new TLP > > > > > > I drafted one in the past > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/marmotta/graduation/resolution.txt > > than we > > > can use as an example for moving forward with this. > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> I would like to revie this thread. > > >> > > >> Again, I would like to encourage others to check if we miss some > > >> formal requirements, other than the VOTE thread here. I bet there are > > >> some little things at least. > > >> > > >> Also https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html talks about > > >> things like propose a "resolution" general incubator list before a > > >> VOTE, etc. (OFBiz is brough up as a good example there.) Anyone > > >> intends to tackle these? > > >> > > >> > > >> Wednesday, November 8, 2017, 1:34:24 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > >> > > >>> So, we have released 2.3.27, and has changed the domain of the home > > >>> page (not of try.freemarker.org though... is that a problem?). > What's > > >>> next? Anyone? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Monday, October 23, 2017, 3:18:54 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:04:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> +1 for the migration. > > >>>>> And right after that I think we should start the graduation > process. > > >>>> > > >>>> Agreed regarding graduation. (We certainly should release 2.3.27 > > >>>> before that, but it's very close anyway, hopefully.) > > >>>> > > >>>> Related: > > >>>> > > >>>> - > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/ > > >> Apache+FreeMarker+Project+Maturity+Model > > >>>> > > >>>> - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html: > > >>>> Here some dates are year only. > > >>>> > > >>>> - https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker: > > >>>> This has some glitches, like it states "No Release Yet/Binary has > > >>>> licensing issues"... will have to update this somehow. > > >>>> > > >>>>> Jacopo > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Dekany < > ddek...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up > > >> again > > >>>>>> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. > > >> Also > > >>>>>> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > > >>>>>>>>>> Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux > > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), > also > > >> I hear > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that starting from October they want to show warning in > > >> Chrome if > > >>>>>> you > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page > > >> under > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> That would be great, thanks! > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do it > > >> yet. > > >>>>>>>>>>> But I should be able to start this week, most likely > Monday... > > >>>>>>>>>> No problem, and thanks for keep us informed! > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques > > >>>>>>>>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be > > >> available > > >>>>>> before November > > >>>>>>>>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far > all > > >> seems > > >>>>>> OK :) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our site, > so > > >> no > > >>>>>>>> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, for > > >> now.) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for the checking the release! > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I should also point out that in the last board report the issue > of > > >>>>>>> freemarker not yet having an apache.org <http://apache.org/> web > > >>>>>>> site came up. I would suggest that the project make that > transition > > >>>>>>> sooner than later if graduation is desired. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Ralph > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>> Daniel Dekany > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Thanks, > > >> Daniel Dekany > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >
