Wednesday, December 20, 2017, 9:31:19 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > The very next steps should be: > 1) run a vote in this list to make sure the community is happy to graduate; > see "Community Graduation Vote" [*] > 2) when the vote #1 starts, send an email to the Incubator general list to > inform them that the vote is running > I suggest to perform them now.
Aggreed. > Then the next steps will be (assuming the vote has passed): > 3) prepare the graduation proposal; see "Preparing a Charter" [**] > 4) send the proposal to the Incubator general list for review before the > vote > 5) start the graduation vote in the Incubator general list; see "The > Recommendation Vote" [***] > > Then (if the recommendation vote will be successful) we will submit the > resolution to the Board. > > Regards, > > Jacopo > > [*] > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community_graduation_vote > [**] > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#preparing_a_charter > [***] > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#the_recommendation_vote > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Right. Sorry for the confusion. When I said "committed" I wanted to say >> people engadget with the project after graduation, so PMC members in short. >> >> I believe Daniel already got this list pretty clear. >> >> On Dec 16, 2017 14:07, "Ralph Goers" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > The board needs a list of the PMC members, not necessarily committers, >> > although it is unusual that a podling will become a TLP with committers >> who >> > aren’t PMC members. >> > >> > Ralph >> > >> > > On Dec 15, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > HI Daniel, >> > > >> > > the graduation resolution is a formal text that has to be submitted to >> > the >> > > ASF Board to communicate the graduation of the podling. Further >> > information >> > > at >> > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html# >> > submission_of_the_resolution_to_the_board >> > > >> > > It has to be drafted internally, voted first by the PPMC and secondly >> by >> > > the IPMC (not that different than voting a release). >> > > >> > > The text is pretty standard. The two main things to decide are: 1) who >> is >> > > going to be the Freemarker VP 2) list of committed to the new TLP >> > > >> > > I drafted one in the past >> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/marmotta/graduation/resolution.txt >> > than we >> > > can use as an example for moving forward with this. >> > > >> > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> I would like to revie this thread. >> > >> >> > >> Again, I would like to encourage others to check if we miss some >> > >> formal requirements, other than the VOTE thread here. I bet there are >> > >> some little things at least. >> > >> >> > >> Also https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html talks about >> > >> things like propose a "resolution" general incubator list before a >> > >> VOTE, etc. (OFBiz is brough up as a good example there.) Anyone >> > >> intends to tackle these? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Wednesday, November 8, 2017, 1:34:24 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> So, we have released 2.3.27, and has changed the domain of the home >> > >>> page (not of try.freemarker.org though... is that a problem?). >> What's >> > >>> next? Anyone? >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Monday, October 23, 2017, 3:18:54 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:04:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> +1 for the migration. >> > >>>>> And right after that I think we should start the graduation >> process. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Agreed regarding graduation. (We certainly should release 2.3.27 >> > >>>> before that, but it's very close anyway, hopefully.) >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Related: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> - >> > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/ >> > >> Apache+FreeMarker+Project+Maturity+Model >> > >>>> >> > >>>> - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html: >> > >>>> Here some dates are year only. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> - https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker: >> > >>>> This has some glitches, like it states "No Release Yet/Binary has >> > >>>> licensing issues"... will have to update this somehow. >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Jacopo >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Dekany < >> [email protected]> >> > >> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>>> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up >> > >> again >> > >>>>>> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. >> > >> Also >> > >>>>>> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it? >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >> > >> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> > >>>>>>>>>> Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux >> > wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), >> also >> > >> I hear >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that starting from October they want to show warning in >> > >> Chrome if >> > >>>>>> you >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page >> > >> under >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> That would be great, thanks! >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do it >> > >> yet. >> > >>>>>>>>>>> But I should be able to start this week, most likely >> Monday... >> > >>>>>>>>>> No problem, and thanks for keep us informed! >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >> > >>>>>>>>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be >> > >> available >> > >>>>>> before November >> > >>>>>>>>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far >> all >> > >> seems >> > >>>>>> OK :) >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our site, >> so >> > >> no >> > >>>>>>>> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, for >> > >> now.) >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Thanks for the checking the release! >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> I should also point out that in the last board report the issue >> of >> > >>>>>>> freemarker not yet having an apache.org <http://apache.org/> web >> > >>>>>>> site came up. I would suggest that the project make that >> transition >> > >>>>>>> sooner than later if graduation is desired. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Ralph >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>> Thanks, >> > >>>>>> Daniel Dekany >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> Daniel Dekany >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
