Right. Sorry for the confusion. When I said "committed" I wanted to say people engadget with the project after graduation, so PMC members in short.
I believe Daniel already got this list pretty clear. On Dec 16, 2017 14:07, "Ralph Goers" <[email protected]> wrote: > The board needs a list of the PMC members, not necessarily committers, > although it is unusual that a podling will become a TLP with committers who > aren’t PMC members. > > Ralph > > > On Dec 15, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > HI Daniel, > > > > the graduation resolution is a formal text that has to be submitted to > the > > ASF Board to communicate the graduation of the podling. Further > information > > at > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html# > submission_of_the_resolution_to_the_board > > > > It has to be drafted internally, voted first by the PPMC and secondly by > > the IPMC (not that different than voting a release). > > > > The text is pretty standard. The two main things to decide are: 1) who is > > going to be the Freemarker VP 2) list of committed to the new TLP > > > > I drafted one in the past > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/marmotta/graduation/resolution.txt > than we > > can use as an example for moving forward with this. > > > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I would like to revie this thread. > >> > >> Again, I would like to encourage others to check if we miss some > >> formal requirements, other than the VOTE thread here. I bet there are > >> some little things at least. > >> > >> Also https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html talks about > >> things like propose a "resolution" general incubator list before a > >> VOTE, etc. (OFBiz is brough up as a good example there.) Anyone > >> intends to tackle these? > >> > >> > >> Wednesday, November 8, 2017, 1:34:24 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > >> > >>> So, we have released 2.3.27, and has changed the domain of the home > >>> page (not of try.freemarker.org though... is that a problem?). What's > >>> next? Anyone? > >>> > >>> > >>> Monday, October 23, 2017, 3:18:54 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > >>> > >>>> Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:04:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 for the migration. > >>>>> And right after that I think we should start the graduation process. > >>>> > >>>> Agreed regarding graduation. (We certainly should release 2.3.27 > >>>> before that, but it's very close anyway, hopefully.) > >>>> > >>>> Related: > >>>> > >>>> - > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/ > >> Apache+FreeMarker+Project+Maturity+Model > >>>> > >>>> - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html: > >>>> Here some dates are year only. > >>>> > >>>> - https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker: > >>>> This has some glitches, like it states "No Release Yet/Binary has > >>>> licensing issues"... will have to update this somehow. > >>>> > >>>>> Jacopo > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up > >> again > >>>>>> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. > >> Also > >>>>>> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > >>>>>>>>>> Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > >>>>>>>>>>>> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), also > >> I hear > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that starting from October they want to show warning in > >> Chrome if > >>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page > >> under > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October. > >>>>>>>>>>>> That would be great, thanks! > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do it > >> yet. > >>>>>>>>>>> But I should be able to start this week, most likely Monday... > >>>>>>>>>> No problem, and thanks for keep us informed! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>>>>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be > >> available > >>>>>> before November > >>>>>>>>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far all > >> seems > >>>>>> OK :) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our site, so > >> no > >>>>>>>> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, for > >> now.) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks for the checking the release! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I should also point out that in the last board report the issue of > >>>>>>> freemarker not yet having an apache.org <http://apache.org/> web > >>>>>>> site came up. I would suggest that the project make that transition > >>>>>>> sooner than later if graduation is desired. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ralph > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Daniel Dekany > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks, > >> Daniel Dekany > >> > >> > > >
