JVSD has appeared in the Geode user manual since M2. See http://geode.docs.pivotal.io/docs/tools_modules/jvsd.html. Kirk, are you recommending that we remove this?
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > I would recommend not mentioning jVSD at all in the Geode 1.0 docs. Right > now it's just a Jira ticket and feature branch. I think the docs should > only cover what's in Geode 1.0. > > If there's some doc or wiki page about proposed future features or features > currently looking for contributors/developers, then that would probably be > an appropriate place to mention jVSD. > > Thanks, > Kirk > > On Thursday, September 22, 2016, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > Bumping this. Any thoughts? > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:50 AM Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > To what degree should jVSD be mentioned in the docs? The current > writeup > > is > > > essentially "go get it if you want it, but be warned that it's not > fully > > > baked and we don't support it". > > > Would that still be the appropriate jVSD policy for 1.0.0? > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > I don't think we should try to include jVSD in 1.0.0 at this point, > > > because > > > > it introduces dependencies that might make the 1.0.0 release more > > > > complicated such as the MultiAxisChartFX dependency. But I think the > > > should > > > > try to get it to develop sooner rather than later to make it easier > for > > > > people to get jVSD and play with it. > > > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > > > > > >
