On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > When would 0.91 branch be created ? > We should reduce the number of open critical bugs for 0.90 - each such > issue > would soon be integrated to 3 branches after 0.91 branch is created. >
Sorry, I should have been clear that I would imagine 0.91 would be a "dev release" series like 0.89. That is to say, there would be no 0.91 branch, just a few "snapshot style" releases with minimal pre-release testing to get us in shape for 92. These releases would never have point releases done on top (and thus not need to have changes backported to them one released). Consider it another name for an extended release candidate period for 0.92. -Todd > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Maybe we should do an 0.91 dev release tout de suite? Folks who want > > 3777 and coprocessors and the other nice stuff can then help us bake > > towards 92 ? > > > > Todd > > > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> After discussion below, I wonder if 0.92.0RC would come out before > > 0.90.4 > > >> I hope that's the case - we're looking forward to coprocessor which > > wouldn't > > >> be in 0.90.x anyway. > > >> > > > > > > Plan is to put up a 0.92.0 'soon', in the next week or so. I'm not > > > sure when 0.90.4 will see light of day. There's a good few blockers > > > and criticals but if a few of us have a go at them, we'll knock it out > > > tout de suite (This is what I'm working on at mo). > > > > > > Good stuff, > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
