I assume release manager has to be a committer. So, although I want to help ...
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > We cut cut a 0.91 now as Todd suggests but would need a release > manager to run the release. > St.Ack > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Barney Frank's request for help brought me back to this discussion. > > When would 0.91 release come ? > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I am looking forward to this 0.91 release. > >> > >> > >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > When would 0.91 branch be created ? > >>> > We should reduce the number of open critical bugs for 0.90 - each > such > >>> > issue > >>> > would soon be integrated to 3 branches after 0.91 branch is created. > >>> > > >>> > >>> Sorry, I should have been clear that I would imagine 0.91 would be a > "dev > >>> release" series like 0.89. That is to say, there would be no 0.91 > branch, > >>> just a few "snapshot style" releases with minimal pre-release testing > to > >>> get > >>> us in shape for 92. These releases would never have point releases done > on > >>> top (and thus not need to have changes backported to them one > released). > >>> > >>> Consider it another name for an extended release candidate period for > >>> 0.92. > >>> > >>> -Todd > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Maybe we should do an 0.91 dev release tout de suite? Folks who > want > >>> > > 3777 and coprocessors and the other nice stuff can then help us > bake > >>> > > towards 92 ? > >>> > > > >>> > > Todd > >>> > > > >>> > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > > >> After discussion below, I wonder if 0.92.0RC would come out > before > >>> > > 0.90.4 > >>> > > >> I hope that's the case - we're looking forward to coprocessor > which > >>> > > wouldn't > >>> > > >> be in 0.90.x anyway. > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Plan is to put up a 0.92.0 'soon', in the next week or so. I'm > not > >>> > > > sure when 0.90.4 will see light of day. There's a good few > blockers > >>> > > > and criticals but if a few of us have a go at them, we'll knock > it > >>> out > >>> > > > tout de suite (This is what I'm working on at mo). > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Good stuff, > >>> > > > St.Ack > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > -- > >>> > > Todd Lipcon > >>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Todd Lipcon > >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >>> > >> > >> > > >
