I am looking forward to this 0.91 release. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > When would 0.91 branch be created ? > > We should reduce the number of open critical bugs for 0.90 - each such > > issue > > would soon be integrated to 3 branches after 0.91 branch is created. > > > > Sorry, I should have been clear that I would imagine 0.91 would be a "dev > release" series like 0.89. That is to say, there would be no 0.91 branch, > just a few "snapshot style" releases with minimal pre-release testing to > get > us in shape for 92. These releases would never have point releases done on > top (and thus not need to have changes backported to them one released). > > Consider it another name for an extended release candidate period for 0.92. > > -Todd > > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Maybe we should do an 0.91 dev release tout de suite? Folks who want > > > 3777 and coprocessors and the other nice stuff can then help us bake > > > towards 92 ? > > > > > > Todd > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> After discussion below, I wonder if 0.92.0RC would come out before > > > 0.90.4 > > > >> I hope that's the case - we're looking forward to coprocessor which > > > wouldn't > > > >> be in 0.90.x anyway. > > > >> > > > > > > > > Plan is to put up a 0.92.0 'soon', in the next week or so. I'm not > > > > sure when 0.90.4 will see light of day. There's a good few blockers > > > > and criticals but if a few of us have a go at them, we'll knock it > out > > > > tout de suite (This is what I'm working on at mo). > > > > > > > > Good stuff, > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Todd Lipcon > > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >
