We were discussing release of 0.91 off of trunk. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Gaojinchao <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can do some test for 0.90.X if it needs. > > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Jean-Daniel Cryans > 发送时间: 2011年5月17日 2:31 > 收件人: [email protected] > 主题: Re: Release 0.90.3 soon? > > Run the unit tests, try it on a handful of machines, basically just > make sure it's usable. > > J-D > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > I assume release manager has to be a committer. So, although I want to > help > > ... > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> We cut cut a 0.91 now as Todd suggests but would need a release > >> manager to run the release. > >> St.Ack > >> > >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Barney Frank's request for help brought me back to this discussion. > >> > When would 0.91 release come ? > >> > > >> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> I am looking forward to this 0.91 release. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > When would 0.91 branch be created ? > >> >>> > We should reduce the number of open critical bugs for 0.90 - each > >> such > >> >>> > issue > >> >>> > would soon be integrated to 3 branches after 0.91 branch is > created. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> Sorry, I should have been clear that I would imagine 0.91 would be a > >> "dev > >> >>> release" series like 0.89. That is to say, there would be no 0.91 > >> branch, > >> >>> just a few "snapshot style" releases with minimal pre-release > testing > >> to > >> >>> get > >> >>> us in shape for 92. These releases would never have point releases > done > >> on > >> >>> top (and thus not need to have changes backported to them one > >> released). > >> >>> > >> >>> Consider it another name for an extended release candidate period > for > >> >>> 0.92. > >> >>> > >> >>> -Todd > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Maybe we should do an 0.91 dev release tout de suite? Folks who > >> want > >> >>> > > 3777 and coprocessors and the other nice stuff can then help us > >> bake > >> >>> > > towards 92 ? > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > Todd > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> After discussion below, I wonder if 0.92.0RC would come out > >> before > >> >>> > > 0.90.4 > >> >>> > > >> I hope that's the case - we're looking forward to coprocessor > >> which > >> >>> > > wouldn't > >> >>> > > >> be in 0.90.x anyway. > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > Plan is to put up a 0.92.0 'soon', in the next week or so. > I'm > >> not > >> >>> > > > sure when 0.90.4 will see light of day. There's a good few > >> blockers > >> >>> > > > and criticals but if a few of us have a go at them, we'll > knock > >> it > >> >>> out > >> >>> > > > tout de suite (This is what I'm working on at mo). > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > Good stuff, > >> >>> > > > St.Ack > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > -- > >> >>> > > Todd Lipcon > >> >>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Todd Lipcon > >> >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
