I can do some test for 0.90.X if it needs.
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Jean-Daniel Cryans 发送时间: 2011年5月17日 2:31 收件人: [email protected] 主题: Re: Release 0.90.3 soon? Run the unit tests, try it on a handful of machines, basically just make sure it's usable. J-D On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > I assume release manager has to be a committer. So, although I want to help > ... > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We cut cut a 0.91 now as Todd suggests but would need a release >> manager to run the release. >> St.Ack >> >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Barney Frank's request for help brought me back to this discussion. >> > When would 0.91 release come ? >> > >> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> I am looking forward to this 0.91 release. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > When would 0.91 branch be created ? >> >>> > We should reduce the number of open critical bugs for 0.90 - each >> such >> >>> > issue >> >>> > would soon be integrated to 3 branches after 0.91 branch is created. >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> Sorry, I should have been clear that I would imagine 0.91 would be a >> "dev >> >>> release" series like 0.89. That is to say, there would be no 0.91 >> branch, >> >>> just a few "snapshot style" releases with minimal pre-release testing >> to >> >>> get >> >>> us in shape for 92. These releases would never have point releases done >> on >> >>> top (and thus not need to have changes backported to them one >> released). >> >>> >> >>> Consider it another name for an extended release candidate period for >> >>> 0.92. >> >>> >> >>> -Todd >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > > Maybe we should do an 0.91 dev release tout de suite? Folks who >> want >> >>> > > 3777 and coprocessors and the other nice stuff can then help us >> bake >> >>> > > towards 92 ? >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Todd >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> > > >> After discussion below, I wonder if 0.92.0RC would come out >> before >> >>> > > 0.90.4 >> >>> > > >> I hope that's the case - we're looking forward to coprocessor >> which >> >>> > > wouldn't >> >>> > > >> be in 0.90.x anyway. >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Plan is to put up a 0.92.0 'soon', in the next week or so. I'm >> not >> >>> > > > sure when 0.90.4 will see light of day. There's a good few >> blockers >> >>> > > > and criticals but if a few of us have a go at them, we'll knock >> it >> >>> out >> >>> > > > tout de suite (This is what I'm working on at mo). >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Good stuff, >> >>> > > > St.Ack >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > -- >> >>> > > Todd Lipcon >> >>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Todd Lipcon >> >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >
