We cut cut a 0.91 now as Todd suggests but would need a release manager to run the release. St.Ack
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > Barney Frank's request for help brought me back to this discussion. > When would 0.91 release come ? > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am looking forward to this 0.91 release. >> >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > When would 0.91 branch be created ? >>> > We should reduce the number of open critical bugs for 0.90 - each such >>> > issue >>> > would soon be integrated to 3 branches after 0.91 branch is created. >>> > >>> >>> Sorry, I should have been clear that I would imagine 0.91 would be a "dev >>> release" series like 0.89. That is to say, there would be no 0.91 branch, >>> just a few "snapshot style" releases with minimal pre-release testing to >>> get >>> us in shape for 92. These releases would never have point releases done on >>> top (and thus not need to have changes backported to them one released). >>> >>> Consider it another name for an extended release candidate period for >>> 0.92. >>> >>> -Todd >>> >>> >>> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Maybe we should do an 0.91 dev release tout de suite? Folks who want >>> > > 3777 and coprocessors and the other nice stuff can then help us bake >>> > > towards 92 ? >>> > > >>> > > Todd >>> > > >>> > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >> After discussion below, I wonder if 0.92.0RC would come out before >>> > > 0.90.4 >>> > > >> I hope that's the case - we're looking forward to coprocessor which >>> > > wouldn't >>> > > >> be in 0.90.x anyway. >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>> > > > Plan is to put up a 0.92.0 'soon', in the next week or so. I'm not >>> > > > sure when 0.90.4 will see light of day. There's a good few blockers >>> > > > and criticals but if a few of us have a go at them, we'll knock it >>> out >>> > > > tout de suite (This is what I'm working on at mo). >>> > > > >>> > > > Good stuff, >>> > > > St.Ack >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Todd Lipcon >>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> >> >> >
