On Sunday 02 September 2001 11:07, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 12:43:09PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > > The gzip content encoding is part of the HTTP spec.
> >
> > By implementation, or reference? Sure Content-encoding is part of the
> > spec, and it's defined to allow authors to extend their support to any
> > number of encodings, and forces the server to use only what the client
> > claims as supported encodings.
>
> gzip is mentioned explicitly in RFC 2616 as a supported content-encoding
> (one registered with IANA).
>
> > +1 with caviat to follow.
>
> Cool. BTW, do these +1 (concept) votes count towards mod_gz's
> inclusion? I now count three binding +1 (concepts) for this (Cliff,
> Greg, and OtherBill). Or, do I need to wait until I receive two
> +1s for mod_gz explicitly?
This is not a 3 +1's and it's in issue. This is a topic currently under
discussion, and adding it to the server now would be rude. This is also
a large enough issue, that it really should be given at least three days for
people who aren't on list to speak up and have an opportunity to comment.
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
