Joshua Slive wrote: > > On 16 May 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > Who would be in favor of this, or parts thereof? I'm anxious to see a > > consensus so that steps toward the goal can be filled in over time. > > +1 That looks good to me. Really, I have no particular problem with httpd > being the wrapper script, but it would certainly cause more disruption to > existing setups. > > A couple points of clarification: > > - I think I would recommend a "This is deprecated" message for the > non -k options so that they don't need to be documented and supported > indefinitely. Then we can make it clear that there is only one true set > of command line options and they apply both to apachectl and httpd. > > - httpd -k restart and httpd -k graceful should do a config check before > restarting and refuse to restart if the config is not valid. > > Joshua.
- Re: is httpd a valid way to... Greg Stein
- Re: is httpd a valid way to... Jos Backus
- Re: is httpd a valid way to... Manoj Kasichainula
- Re: is httpd a valid way to... Jos Backus
- Re: is httpd a valid way to... Manoj Kasichainula
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache... Greg Ames
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Jeff Trawick
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Jeff Trawick
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Joshua Slive
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Greg Ames
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Greg Ames
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Jeff Trawick
- RE: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Ryan Bloom
- RE: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Joshua Slive
- RE: is httpd a valid way to start Apache... Rasmus Lerdorf
- RE: is httpd a valid way to start Apache... Scott Hess
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Jeff Trawick
- RE: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Jeroen Massar
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Andrew Ho
- Re: is httpd a valid way to start Apache? Manoj Kasichainula