Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 16 May 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > Who would be in favor of this, or parts thereof? I'm anxious to see a > > consensus so that steps toward the goal can be filled in over time. > > +1 That looks good to me. Really, I have no particular problem with httpd > being the wrapper script, but it would certainly cause more disruption to > existing setups. > > A couple points of clarification: > > - I think I would recommend a "This is deprecated" message for the > non -k options so that they don't need to be documented and supported > indefinitely. Then we can make it clear that there is only one true set > of command line options and they apply both to apachectl and httpd. > > - httpd -k restart and httpd -k graceful should do a config check before > restarting and refuse to restart if the config is not valid.
agreed 100% and "httpd -k start" will make sure that it isn't already running (well, to the extent that apachectl does today)... -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
