Joshua Slive wrote: > On 16 May 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > Who would be in favor of this, or parts thereof? I'm anxious to see a > > consensus so that steps toward the goal can be filled in over time. > > +1 That looks good to me. Really, I have no particular problem with httpd > being the wrapper script, but it would certainly cause more disruption to > existing setups.
What Joshua said. This is going to be somewhat disruptive no matter which way we go, including doing nothing. Greg
