On 07/13/2017 07:36 PM, Luca Toscano wrote:
> I didn't find a real use case for flushpackets=auto in mod_proxy_fcgi, but I > have two proposals for fluspackets=on: > > http://home.apache.org/~elukey/httpd-2.4.x-mod_proxy_fcgi-force_flush.patch > http://home.apache.org/~elukey/httpd-2.4.x-mod_proxy_fcgi-force_flush-v2.patch > > The second one is a bit more conservative and does not insert the FLUSH > bucket if it knows that the content len (clen) > is bigger than the iobuf_size (since there is a goto that forces another > get_data() in this case). I only looked at it very briefly, but from that I would favor v2 of the patch. Regards Rüdiger
