Thanks, Created a ticket and assigned it on Nick https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4402 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4402>
Nick, reassign it on me once the images are ready. — Denis > On Dec 8, 2016, at 12:06 AM, Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Denis > > Usually Nikolay makes docker image for a new release. I just check it. > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Igniters, >> >> Who usually prepares docker and other cloud images for each new Ignite >> release and who will be able to handle it this time? >> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#docker <https://ignite.apache.org/ >> download.cgi#docker> >> >> Sergey K., Nikolay T., are you aware about this? >> >> — >> Denis >> >>> On Dec 3, 2016, at 12:54 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> More news for DML: >>> >>> IGNITE-4364 DML: AssertionError: Row@ ... null 5 -> mapcol_asc_idx >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4364> >>> - sporadic failure, not blocker but need pay attention >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Alexander, thanks for the update and all your efforts! >>>> >>>> Would agree that IGNITE-4340 sounds like a serious bug that should be >>>> fixed in 1.8 while IGNITE-4363 can be put off till the next release. >>>> >>>> As for the vote it should be started in the very beginning of the next >>>> week. We were, mostly, waiting for green light from your side :) >>>> >>>> — >>>> Denis >>>> >>>>> On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Sergey, your issue has been resolved - apparently a won't fix as it's >>>>> not an Ignite problem but a (rather rational) H2's behavior :) It was >>>>> a fun brainteaser before sleep :D Please see details on issue page - >>>>> it's about arithmetic and type conversions. >>>>> >>>>> Dmitry, yes, I do or modify existing tests where applicable. >>>>> >>>>> Latest DML news: >>>>> >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 Implicitly cast >>>>> new column values to expected types on SQL UPDATE - fixed (together >>>>> with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4333 SQL engine does >>>>> not preserve metadata about array content's type and 4346 - the one >>>>> about PHP PDO) >>>>> >>>>> - found inner properties mutation problem >>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4363 Inner properties >>>>> mutation broken in SQL UPDATE) >>>>> >>>>> - the problem above will most likely be fixed post 1.8 with other >>>>> issues/improvements related with DML - I've got a (small :) ) list of >>>>> them and will create proper issues for all that tech debt during the >>>>> weekend or on Monday. >>>>> >>>>> - TC tests seem to be all green on DML side as well as all in all. >>>>> What's the status of release vote guys? >>>>> >>>>> - Alex >>>>> >>>>> 2016-12-03 2:08 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]>: >>>>>> Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits >> for >>>>>> all the fixes you are making? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for >> the >>>>>>> result from the right side >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vladimir, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Igniters, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. >> Looks >>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>> we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which >>>>>>> looks >>>>>>>>> pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved >>>> and >>>>>>>>> start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Vladimir. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Denis, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was >>>>>>>> already >>>>>>>>>> resolved >>>>>>>>>> by another fix made by Alexander. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346 >>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite >> from >>>>>>> PHP >>>>>>>>>> PDO >>>>>>>>>>> side. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The first one is related to DML. >>>>>>>>>>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal < >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue >>>>>>> before >>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 is sent for vote. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability >> only. >>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well. >>>>>>>>>>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in >>>>>>> DSN < >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov < >> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Update for DML testing: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception >> from >>>>>>>>>>> previous >>>>>>>>>>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda < >> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this >>>> feature >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 < >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote >>>>>>> computation >>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature >>>> here. >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- >>>>>>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods < >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- >>>>>>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable >>>>>>> tickets >>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into >> three >>>>>>>> parts >>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I >> see >>>>>>>>>>>>> following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unclear points >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on >>>>>>>>>> ignite-cassandra-store? >>>>>>>>>>>>> In >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that case why do not make one module? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already >>>>>>>> merged >>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 branch). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not >>>>>>> fixed). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to >> send >>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4304 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong >>>> result >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports >>>>>>>>>> several >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML >>>> finalization >>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-1.8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them >> for >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any objections? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into >>>> ignite-1.8. >>>>>>>>>> But >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working >> on >>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings >>>> there. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related >>>>>>> changes? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme. >>>>>>> io/docs/pdo-interoperability >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme. >> io/docs/pdo-interoperability> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch >> is >>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes >>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these >>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases >>>>>>> (shortly): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and >> it >>>>>>>>>> seems >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the >>>>>>> biggest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remaining >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate >>>> branch >>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when >> it >>>>>>>> might >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets >> released. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the >>>>>>>> difficulties >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation >>>>>>>>>> versions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version >>>> for >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to >>>>>>> create a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hidden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it >>>>>>>> visible >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page >>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suffix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi >> will >>>>>>>>>> create >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite- >> developers.2346864.n4.nabble >>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation- >>>> consistency-on-readme-io- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation- >>>> consistency-on-readme-io- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new >>>> features? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis >> Magda >>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets >>>>>>>> merged >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when >> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overall >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but >> without >>>>>>> DML >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in >>>> doing >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time >> to >>>>>>>>>> merge >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code >> itself, >>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that >>>> for >>>>>>>>>> 1.8. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them >> as >>>> I >>>>>>>>>> can. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date >> yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the >> reviews. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ >>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 >>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ >>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 >>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) >> related >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all >>>> the >>>>>>>>>> .NET >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the >>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there >> anyone >>>>>>> who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented >>>> (basicness >>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mostly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to >>>>>>>> specify >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> streamer's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be >>>> improved >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easily). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after >>>>>>>> binary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in >> ignite-4011-1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests >>>> live >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are >> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first >>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test >>>> these >>>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those >> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current >>>> code. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov >>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems >>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov >>>>>>> GridGain Systems >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com >>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sergey Kozlov >>> GridGain Systems >>> www.gridgain.com >> >> > > > -- > Sergey Kozlov > GridGain Systems > www.gridgain.com
