On 23 déc. 07, at 01:53, Pavel Janík wrote:
Charles: what should be used instead of SDF? Do you have at least an
idea? Will you help to implement it?
In reality, these people who wrote that we do not need SDF, do not
want to get rid of SDF. They are not able to express what they
really need and use "get rid of SDF" phrase instead.
Pavel,
The answer is easy:
XLIFF files directly generated from the XML for the help files and
from the rest for the UI.
That is equivalent to a source->po process, and that is the way to go.
Besides, I never said we should get rid of SDF, I said that the
current workflow is not practical and oo2po adds uselessly to the
complexity.
----------------------
Jean-Christophe Helary
http://mac4translators.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
