On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 05:59:05 +0200, Jean-Christophe Helary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23 déc. 07, at 01:53, Pavel Janík wrote: > >> Charles: what should be used instead of SDF? Do you have at least an >> idea? Will you help to implement it? ... > The answer is easy: > > XLIFF files directly generated from the XML for the help files and > from the rest for the UI. > > That is equivalent to a source->po process, and that is the way to go.
Here I should point out that preciously little tools work currently with the 1.1 XLIFF (even Sun's OLT didn't process 1.1 in Spring 2007). Anyway, such change, while disruptive to many, would also be at least useless, if with it won't come extended meta-information coverage (string context etc.) So, possibly the real answer is "extend coverage of meta-information, extending the SDF format appropriately". --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
