On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Dmitri Gabinski wrote: >> No that dictionary.lst will be removed.
> Well, it's too late to cry over the spilled milk, but I find that new > extension mechanism way too quirky compared to dictionary.lst for the cases > when you need to frequently update a dictionary (especially one in process a) Not only for when updating dictionaries, but also for when one has two or more dictionaries for the same language. (The standard dictionary, and specialized subject dictionaries. b) For dictionaries that are not going to be released distributed on the OOo website, requiring an extension is problematical. (Maybe I should be glad that the dictionaries I created were rejected.) xan jonathon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
