Hi all, >> Isn't there? I mean the mechanism for using the extension is not >> implemented in the previous versions, so they wouldn't work, right? > > If indeed any mechanisms necessary to use such dictionary extensions > first appeared in OOo 2.3, then the dependency would be correct. I do > not know; I just assumed the example description.xml had been taken from > an unrelated extension, and wanted to point out this detail.
Yes, it was taken from an unrelated extension just to give an example how that file may look like. Also the mechanism to make use of dictionary extensions is integrated in current developer builds. For officially released builds it is planned to have it available in OOo 3.0. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
