Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Marcin Miłkowski wrote: >> Stephan Bergmann pisze: >>> >>> At a minimum, each (new) extension should have an <identifier>. Also, >>> please do not blindly copy any <dependencies> into new extensions---is >>> there indeed a dependency on OOo 2.3 or greater for such dictionary >>> extensions? >> >> Isn't there? I mean the mechanism for using the extension is not >> implemented in the previous versions, so they wouldn't work, right? > > If indeed any mechanisms necessary to use such dictionary extensions > first appeared in OOo 2.3, then the dependency would be correct. I do > not know; I just assumed the example description.xml had been taken from > an unrelated extension, and wanted to point out this detail.
I think the dependency of dictionary extensions should be on OOo 3.0. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
