On Fri, Jul 12, 2019, at 10:19 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:


> Fedora didn't shut down its users@ list when it deployed
> discussions.fp.o. And adoption of Discourse in Fedora hasn't been very
> high outside of the Silverblue/CoreOS bubble.

Eh, but the traditional Fedora community has a pretty high level of, hmm..how 
to describe it...people likely to be "power email" users, the types of people 
who know how to set up email filtering, may even run their own email servers in 
2019, etc.   That said  I think Discourse is "okay enough" for those people, 
even though it's more "web page" than "email list" (where as mailman 3 is more 
the other way around).

> I'm not opposed to the idea of having an additional channel for user
> support with Discourse on okd.io, though.

We already have too many channels, adding more isn't going to help.   The 
existing lists aren't high traffic, and my high level impression is the people 
posting here are going to be fine with Discourse.

The reason I mentioned commons Slack first is because it's the primary 
entrypoint, and I think Discourse is a better *primary* entrypoint.  

(And not responding directly to Neil here) - Let's please keep proposals for 
any changes to the *real time* stuff like Slack/IRC out of this discussion 
because I'd like to focus on a clear and "direct" goal (Discourse replacing 
mailman) - anything else scope creeps this a lot.


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to