On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:52:48 +0300 Wael wrote: > The idea from it is that flashrom-stable is as the name implies just more > stable > for the most part while also focusing on good support on what it currently > offers - as opposed to the upstream which prioritizes (breaking) changes.
ok but my point is, to have two duplicate packages, the pkgdesc should not be identical - but that difference is not worth mentioning in the pkgdesc; because it is not relevant to the binary package, nor any user's decision of which package to install On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:52:48 +0300 Wael wrote: > It actually might still be relevant to offer both, as while they overlap in > some > of the functionality - yet there are enough differences between them to merit > a > split I think. ok, so can we describe those notable differences in a very few words? if so, what would those words be? is say, "stable version" meaningful enough to influence a user's decision? would we also need to re-package 'flashrom' to change its pkgdesc? _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
