On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 09:10 -0400, bill-auger wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:52:48 +0300 Wael wrote: > > The idea from it is that flashrom-stable is as the name implies just more > > stable > > for the most part while also focusing on good support on what it currently > > offers - as opposed to the upstream which prioritizes (breaking) changes. > > ok but my point is, to have two duplicate packages, the pkgdesc should not be > identical - but that difference is not worth mentioning in the pkgdesc; > because > it is not relevant to the binary package, nor any user's decision of which > package to install > > > On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:52:48 +0300 Wael wrote: > > It actually might still be relevant to offer both, as while they overlap in > > some > > of the functionality - yet there are enough differences between them to > > merit a > > split I think. > > ok, so can we describe those notable differences in a very few words? > > if so, what would those words be? > > is say, "stable version" meaningful enough to influence a user's decision? > > would we also need to re-package 'flashrom' to change its pkgdesc? > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
I think the answer is yes to both, for the most part it ought to be more stable. -- Kind Regards, Wael Karram.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
