On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:10:13 -0400
bill-auger <[email protected]> wrote:
> that extra information (how we build it, or why) is not relevant to
> users of the binary package - there should not be such detail in the
> pkgdesc - pkgdesc is intended to be very brief (one line in a shell)
> for `pacman -Ss` - wael added those rationales to the PKGBUILD already
Good point. Anyway the user already knows that it's being rebuilt
because it's in libre/ so that should be sufficient. 

Else we'd end up telling that we rebuild GRUB because of branding and
at the end we might end up with all the ChangeLog inside the pkgdesc
for some packages.

Denis.

Attachment: pgpFef69uOKmK.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to