On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 09:42 -0400, bill-auger wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 16:32:18 +0300 Wael wrote: > > I think the answer is yes to both, for the most part it ought to be more > > stable. > > note that "stable" does not mean "it wont explode" - as a guide to the user, > that could only mean "my pacman will not upgrade it as often" - are we certain > that even that is true? - i suppose that is what the upstream means by it (but > who knows) - if the "stable" branch releases just as often as the original > "non-stable" branch, than "stable" is quite meaningless Stable in terms of internal architecture - so indeed less likely to explode.
-- Kind Regards, Wael Karram.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
