On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 16:45:44 +0300 Wael wrote: > Stable in terms of internal architecture - so indeed less likely to explode.
that is a mis-use of that term - i would want to describe it to parabola users more accurately perhaps "robust version" captures the intention better? - but frankly, that sounds like nonsense to me - it implies that the arch version is not robust - if that were true, we should definitely remove the "likely to explode" version, so it does not brick anyone's hardware i must assume that only you are misunderstanding the term; and the upstream meant that it releases less often, or will have fewer API- or ABI-breaking changes, or a similar conventional meaning of "stable" to bring back flashrom, flashrom-atable would need to be re-packaged anyways; because i set flashrom-atable to replace flashrom - so we may as well get the descriptions right first _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
