I’ve finished up addressing blockers.  The only remaining one is SOLR-10939: 
JoinQParser gives incorrect results with numeric PointsFields, which Yonik is 
working on.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Jul 25, 2017, at 7:02 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points” label 
> and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the assumption 
> that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for points 
> non-compatibility.
> 
> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m willing to 
> discuss on the issues.
> 
> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now.  I would 
> welcome assistance in clearing them up.
> 
> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which there 
> are currently 12:
> 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved>
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
>> On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>> 
>> I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a spare 
>> cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do.
>> 
>> -Anshum
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie*
>> fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he
>> noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is
>> anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more
>> weeks?
>> 
>> Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with
>> PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for
>> 7.0. I think they all share a label:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter
>> <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to deprecate
>>> : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release until
>>> : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas if we
>>> : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix the tests
>>> : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users. And
>>> : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more volunteers.
>>> 
>>> I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how people can
>>> help out...
>>> 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Hoss
>>> http://www.lucidworks.com/
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to