I'll do a report for Lucene as well before long by the way. Have not made a
config for it just yet.

- Mark

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:49 PM Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yeah, let's not release a major version with JMX monitoring broken.
>
> Here is a 30 run test report for the 7.0 branch:
> http://apache-solr-7-0.bitballoon.com/20170811
>
> - Mark
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:02 PM Tomas Fernandez Lobbe <tflo...@apple.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Lets fix it before releasing. I’d hate to release with a known critical
>> bug.
>>
>> On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ab,
>>
>> How quickly are we talking about? If you suggest, we could wait,
>> depending upon the impact, and the time required to fix it.
>>
>> Anshum
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM Andrzej Białecki <
>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks JMX monitoring. We
>>> could either release with “known issues” and then quickly do 7.0.1, or wait
>>> until it’s fixed.
>>>
>>> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can
>>> evaluate that for an rc as well.
>>>
>>> - Mark
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good news!
>>>>
>>>> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving
>>>> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this on
>>>> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't be
>>>> the case.
>>>>
>>>> Anshum
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points”
>>>>> label and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the
>>>>> assumption that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for 
>>>>> points
>>>>> non-compatibility.
>>>>>
>>>>> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m
>>>>> willing to discuss on the issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now.  I would
>>>>> welcome assistance in clearing them up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which
>>>>> there are currently 12:
>>>>>
>>>>> <
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Steve
>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a
>>>>> spare cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -Anshum
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett <
>>>>> casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie*
>>>>> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he
>>>>> > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is
>>>>> > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more
>>>>> > weeks?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with
>>>>> > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for
>>>>> > 7.0. I think they all share a label:
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter
>>>>> > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to
>>>>> deprecate
>>>>> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release
>>>>> until
>>>>> > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas if
>>>>> we
>>>>> > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix the
>>>>> tests
>>>>> > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users.
>>>>> And
>>>>> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more
>>>>> volunteers.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how
>>>>> people can
>>>>> > > help out...
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > -Hoss
>>>>> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>> - Mark
>>> about.me/markrmiller
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
> - Mark
> about.me/markrmiller
>
-- 
- Mark
about.me/markrmiller

Reply via email to