I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can evaluate
that for an rc as well.

- Mark

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

> Good news!
>
> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving
> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this on
> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't be
> the case.
>
> Anshum
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points”
>> label and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the
>> assumption that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for points
>> non-compatibility.
>>
>> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m willing
>> to discuss on the issues.
>>
>> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now.  I would
>> welcome assistance in clearing them up.
>>
>> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which
>> there are currently 12:
>>
>> <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>>
>> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a
>> spare cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do.
>> >
>> > -Anshum
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett <
>> casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie*
>> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he
>> > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is
>> > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more
>> > weeks?
>> >
>> > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with
>> > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for
>> > 7.0. I think they all share a label:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter
>> > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to
>> deprecate
>> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release
>> until
>> > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas if we
>> > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix the
>> tests
>> > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users. And
>> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more volunteers.
>> > >
>> > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how people
>> can
>> > > help out...
>> > >
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -Hoss
>> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> --
- Mark
about.me/markrmiller

Reply via email to