Yeah, let's not release a major version with JMX monitoring broken. Here is a 30 run test report for the 7.0 branch: http://apache-solr-7-0.bitballoon.com/20170811
- Mark On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:02 PM Tomas Fernandez Lobbe <[email protected]> wrote: > Lets fix it before releasing. I’d hate to release with a known critical > bug. > > On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Ab, > > How quickly are we talking about? If you suggest, we could wait, depending > upon the impact, and the time required to fix it. > > Anshum > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM Andrzej Białecki < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks JMX monitoring. We >> could either release with “known issues” and then quickly do 7.0.1, or wait >> until it’s fixed. >> >> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can evaluate >> that for an rc as well. >> >> - Mark >> >> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Good news! >>> >>> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving >>> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this on >>> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't be >>> the case. >>> >>> Anshum >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points” >>>> label and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the >>>> assumption that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for points >>>> non-compatibility. >>>> >>>> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m >>>> willing to discuss on the issues. >>>> >>>> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now. I would >>>> welcome assistance in clearing them up. >>>> >>>> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which >>>> there are currently 12: >>>> >>>> < >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Steve >>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>> >>>> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a >>>> spare cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do. >>>> > >>>> > -Anshum >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie* >>>> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he >>>> > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is >>>> > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more >>>> > weeks? >>>> > >>>> > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with >>>> > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for >>>> > 7.0. I think they all share a label: >>>> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter >>>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to >>>> deprecate >>>> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release >>>> until >>>> > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas if >>>> we >>>> > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix the >>>> tests >>>> > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users. >>>> And >>>> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more >>>> volunteers. >>>> > > >>>> > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how >>>> people can >>>> > > help out... >>>> > > >>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807 >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > -Hoss >>>> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/ >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> -- >> - Mark >> about.me/markrmiller >> >> >> > -- - Mark about.me/markrmiller
