Lets fix it before releasing. I’d hate to release with a known critical bug.
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Ab, > > How quickly are we talking about? If you suggest, we could wait, depending > upon the impact, and the time required to fix it. > > Anshum > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM Andrzej Białecki > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks JMX monitoring. We could > either release with “known issues” and then quickly do 7.0.1, or wait until > it’s fixed. > >> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can evaluate >> that for an rc as well. >> >> - Mark >> >> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Good news! >> >> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving >> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this on >> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't be the >> case. >> >> Anshum >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points” label >> and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the assumption >> that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for points >> non-compatibility. >> >> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m willing to >> discuss on the issues. >> >> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now. I would >> welcome assistance in clearing them up. >> >> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which there >> are currently 12: >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved>> >> >> -- >> Steve >> www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/> >> >> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a spare >> > cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do. >> > >> > -Anshum >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie* >> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he >> > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is >> > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more >> > weeks? >> > >> > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with >> > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for >> > 7.0. I think they all share a label: >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points >> > >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points> >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter >> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > > >> > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to deprecate >> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release until >> > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas if we >> > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix the tests >> > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users. And >> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more volunteers. >> > > >> > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how people can >> > > help out... >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807 >> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -Hoss >> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/ <http://www.lucidworks.com/> >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > <mailto:[email protected]> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > <mailto:[email protected]> >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]> >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> -- >> - Mark >> about.me/markrmiller <http://about.me/markrmiller>
