Lets fix it before releasing. I’d hate to release with a known critical bug.

> On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ab,
> 
> How quickly are we talking about? If you suggest, we could wait, depending 
> upon the impact, and the time required to fix it.
> 
> Anshum
> 
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM Andrzej Białecki 
> <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com <mailto:andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com>> 
> wrote:
> I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks JMX monitoring. We could 
> either release with “known issues” and then quickly do 7.0.1, or wait until 
> it’s fixed.
> 
>> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can evaluate 
>> that for an rc as well.
>> 
>> - Mark
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net 
>> <mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net>> wrote:
>> Good news! 
>> 
>> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving 
>> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this on 
>> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't be the 
>> case.
>> 
>> Anshum
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:sar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points” label 
>> and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the assumption 
>> that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for points 
>> non-compatibility.
>> 
>> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m willing to 
>> discuss on the issues.
>> 
>> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now.  I would 
>> welcome assistance in clearing them up.
>> 
>> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which there 
>> are currently 12:
>> 
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved
>>  
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved>>
>> 
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
>> 
>> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net 
>> > <mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a spare 
>> > cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do.
>> >
>> > -Anshum
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com 
>> > <mailto:casstarg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie*
>> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he
>> > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is
>> > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more
>> > weeks?
>> >
>> > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with
>> > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for
>> > 7.0. I think they all share a label:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points
>> >  
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points>
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter
>> > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org <mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to deprecate
>> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release until
>> > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas if we
>> > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix the tests
>> > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users. And
>> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more volunteers.
>> > >
>> > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how people can
>> > > help out...
>> > >
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807 
>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -Hoss
>> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/ <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org 
>> > > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org 
>> > > <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org 
>> > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org 
>> > <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org 
>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org 
>> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
>> 
>> -- 
>> - Mark 
>> about.me/markrmiller <http://about.me/markrmiller>

Reply via email to