Thanks Steve, seems like we're really close. I'll be cutting an RC a couple
of days after the last blocker gets resolved, just to give Jenkins some
time.

Anshum

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 5:44 PM Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh, SOLR-11183 is also a Blocker, I just put 7.0 as fixVersion so that it
> will show up on the 7.0 Blockers JIRA query.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Aug 4, 2017, at 8:28 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I’ve finished up addressing blockers.  The only remaining one is
> SOLR-10939: JoinQParser gives incorrect results with numeric PointsFields,
> which Yonik is working on.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> >> On Jul 25, 2017, at 7:02 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points”
> label and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the
> assumption that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for points
> non-compatibility.
> >>
> >> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m
> willing to discuss on the issues.
> >>
> >> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now.  I would
> welcome assistance in clearing them up.
> >>
> >> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which
> there are currently 12:
> >>
> >> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Steve
> >> www.lucidworks.com
> >>
> >>> On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a
> spare cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do.
> >>>
> >>> -Anshum
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett <
> casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie*
> >>> fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he
> >>> noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is
> >>> anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more
> >>> weeks?
> >>>
> >>> Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with
> >>> PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for
> >>> 7.0. I think they all share a label:
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter
> >>> <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to
> deprecate
> >>>> : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release
> until
> >>>> : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas if we
> >>>> : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix the
> tests
> >>>> : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users. And
> >>>> : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more volunteers.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how people
> can
> >>>> help out...
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -Hoss
> >>>> http://www.lucidworks.com/
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to