sorry for the last minute notice. I need to fix the folowing as well. It may take a few hours https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11239
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Andrzej Białecki <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: > Then, if I may be so bold, I’d like to slip in SOLR-11235, which is a simple > AlreadyClosedException prevention fix. Patch is ready, tests are passing. > > On 14 Aug 2017, at 19:17, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > > Thanks Ab. > > I'll cut an RC on Wednesday, so that both, I get the time, and also that the > tests get some time on Jenkins. > > Anshum > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:29 AM Andrzej Białecki > <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I’ve committed the fix for SOLR-11221 to branch_7_0 (and branch_7x and >> master). >> >> On 12 Aug 2017, at 02:20, Andrzej Białecki >> <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Anshum, >> >> The patch for SOLR-11221 is ready, with one caveat - it required larger >> changes than I thought, so there’s a sizeable chunk of new code that is not >> so well tested… I added a test that used to fail without this change, and >> manual testing confirms that metrics are now correctly reported after core >> reloads. >> >> We could postpone this fix to 7.0.1 if there are objections, but I think >> it should go in to 7.0 - without the fix JMX reporting is surely broken, >> with the fix it’s only a possibility ;) >> >> >> On 11 Aug 2017, at 19:59, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the report Mark! >> >> and yes, I'll wait until the JMX issue is fixed. >> >> Anshum >> >> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, let's not release a major version with JMX monitoring broken. >>> >>> Here is a 30 run test report for the 7.0 branch: >>> http://apache-solr-7-0.bitballoon.com/20170811 >>> >>> - Mark >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:02 PM Tomas Fernandez Lobbe <tflo...@apple.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Lets fix it before releasing. I’d hate to release with a known critical >>>> bug. >>>> >>>> On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Ab, >>>> >>>> How quickly are we talking about? If you suggest, we could wait, >>>> depending upon the impact, and the time required to fix it. >>>> >>>> Anshum >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM Andrzej Białecki >>>> <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks JMX monitoring. We >>>>> could either release with “known issues” and then quickly do 7.0.1, or >>>>> wait >>>>> until it’s fixed. >>>>> >>>>> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can >>>>> evaluate that for an rc as well. >>>>> >>>>> - Mark >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Good news! >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving >>>>>> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this on >>>>>> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't be >>>>>> the >>>>>> case. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anshum >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I worked through the list of issues with the >>>>>>> "numeric-tries-to-points” label and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that >>>>>>> seemed >>>>>>> reasonable, on the assumption that we should at a minimum give clear >>>>>>> error >>>>>>> messages for points non-compatibility. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m >>>>>>> willing to discuss on the issues. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now. I >>>>>>> would welcome assistance in clearing them up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which >>>>>>> there are currently 12: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a >>>>>>> > spare cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -Anshum >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett >>>>>>> > <casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all >>>>>>> > Trie* >>>>>>> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As >>>>>>> > he >>>>>>> > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is >>>>>>> > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ >>>>>>> > more >>>>>>> > weeks? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with >>>>>>> > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers >>>>>>> > for >>>>>>> > 7.0. I think they all share a label: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter >>>>>>> > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to >>>>>>> > > deprecate >>>>>>> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release >>>>>>> > > until >>>>>>> > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas >>>>>>> > > if we >>>>>>> > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix >>>>>>> > > the tests >>>>>>> > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for >>>>>>> > > users. And >>>>>>> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more >>>>>>> > > volunteers. >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how >>>>>>> > > people can >>>>>>> > > help out... >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807 >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > -Hoss >>>>>>> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/ >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> - Mark >>>>> about.me/markrmiller >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> - Mark >>> about.me/markrmiller >> >> >> > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
