bq. Thanks for the report Mark!

I hope to start doing this for all the releases and keep that info around a
while so that we can make a simple comparison release to release on top of
like a regularly weekly report.

- Mark

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:59 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

> Thanks for the report Mark!
>
> and yes, I'll wait until the JMX issue is fixed.
>
> Anshum
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, let's not release a major version with JMX monitoring broken.
>>
>> Here is a 30 run test report for the 7.0 branch:
>> http://apache-solr-7-0.bitballoon.com/20170811
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:02 PM Tomas Fernandez Lobbe <tflo...@apple.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Lets fix it before releasing. I’d hate to release with a known critical
>>> bug.
>>>
>>> On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ab,
>>>
>>> How quickly are we talking about? If you suggest, we could wait,
>>> depending upon the impact, and the time required to fix it.
>>>
>>> Anshum
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM Andrzej Białecki <
>>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks JMX monitoring. We
>>>> could either release with “known issues” and then quickly do 7.0.1, or wait
>>>> until it’s fixed.
>>>>
>>>> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can
>>>> evaluate that for an rc as well.
>>>>
>>>> - Mark
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good news!
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving
>>>>> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this on
>>>>> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't be
>>>>> the case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anshum
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I worked through the list of issues with the
>>>>>> "numeric-tries-to-points” label and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that 
>>>>>> seemed
>>>>>> reasonable, on the assumption that we should at a minimum give clear 
>>>>>> error
>>>>>> messages for points non-compatibility.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m
>>>>>> willing to discuss on the issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now.  I
>>>>>> would welcome assistance in clearing them up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which
>>>>>> there are currently 12:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a
>>>>>> spare cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > -Anshum
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett <
>>>>>> casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all
>>>>>> Trie*
>>>>>> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As
>>>>>> he
>>>>>> > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is
>>>>>> > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more
>>>>>> > weeks?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with
>>>>>> > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for
>>>>>> > 7.0. I think they all share a label:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter
>>>>>> > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to
>>>>>> deprecate
>>>>>> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release
>>>>>> until
>>>>>> > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas
>>>>>> if we
>>>>>> > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix
>>>>>> the tests
>>>>>> > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for
>>>>>> users. And
>>>>>> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more
>>>>>> volunteers.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how
>>>>>> people can
>>>>>> > > help out...
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > -Hoss
>>>>>> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>> - Mark
>>>> about.me/markrmiller
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>> - Mark
>> about.me/markrmiller
>>
> --
- Mark
about.me/markrmiller

Reply via email to