Ishan:

I have 11297 ready to rock-n-roll, it's just a matter of pushing it. Give
me a few.

The thing I'm not clear on is what to do with CHANGES.txt. Currently it's
in 7.0.1 and 7.1.

I propose adding a 6.6.2 section to 6x and including it there and leaving
it in the 7.0.1 and 7.1 sections of master.

I'll do it that way, you can change it if you want unless I hear back from
you sooner.

Erick

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Sounds good.  Thank you!
>
>
>
> *From:* Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 5:25 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: 6.6.2 Release
>
>
>
> > Any chance we could get SOLR-11450 in?  I understand if the answer is
> no. 😊
>
> Currently, I want to have this release out as soon as possible so as to
> mitigate the risk exposure of the security vulnerability. Since this is not
> committed yet, I'd vote for leaving this out and possibly having it
> included in a later release, if needed.
>
> +1 to SOLR-11297.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 2:32 AM, David Smiley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Suggested criteria for bug-fix release issues:
>
> * fixes a bug :-)     and doesn't harm backwards-compatibility in the
> process
>
> * helps users upgrade to later versions
>
> * documentation
>
>
>
> +1 to SOLR-11297
>
>
>
> I'm not sure on SOLR-11450.  Seems it might introduce a back-compat issue?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:40 PM Erick Erickson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I'd also like to get SOLR-11297 in if there are no objections. Ditto if
> the answer is no....
>
>
>
> It's quite a safe fix though.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Any chance we could get SOLR-11450 in?  I understand if the answer is no.
> 😊
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> *From:* Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 4:23 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* 6.6.2 Release
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In light of [0], we need a 6.6.2 release as soon as possible.
>
> I'd like to volunteer to RM for this release, unless someone else wants to
> do so or has an objection.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ishan
>
>
>
> [0] - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/news.html#12-october-
> 2017-please-secure-your-apache-solr-servers-since-a-
> zero-day-exploit-has-been-reported-on-a-public-mailing-list
>
>
>
> --
>
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.
> solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>
>

Reply via email to