Sure Erick, please go ahead. I'll start the release later today. Thanks, Ishan
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > Ishan: > > I have 11297 ready to rock-n-roll, it's just a matter of pushing it. Give > me a few. > > The thing I'm not clear on is what to do with CHANGES.txt. Currently it's > in 7.0.1 and 7.1. > > I propose adding a 6.6.2 section to 6x and including it there and leaving > it in the 7.0.1 and 7.1 sections of master. > > I'll do it that way, you can change it if you want unless I hear back from > you sooner. > > Erick > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Sounds good. Thank you! >> >> >> >> *From:* Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 5:25 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: 6.6.2 Release >> >> >> >> > Any chance we could get SOLR-11450 in? I understand if the answer is >> no. 😊 >> >> Currently, I want to have this release out as soon as possible so as to >> mitigate the risk exposure of the security vulnerability. Since this is not >> committed yet, I'd vote for leaving this out and possibly having it >> included in a later release, if needed. >> >> +1 to SOLR-11297. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 2:32 AM, David Smiley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Suggested criteria for bug-fix release issues: >> >> * fixes a bug :-) and doesn't harm backwards-compatibility in the >> process >> >> * helps users upgrade to later versions >> >> * documentation >> >> >> >> +1 to SOLR-11297 >> >> >> >> I'm not sure on SOLR-11450. Seems it might introduce a back-compat issue? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:40 PM Erick Erickson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I'd also like to get SOLR-11297 in if there are no objections. Ditto if >> the answer is no.... >> >> >> >> It's quite a safe fix though. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Any chance we could get SOLR-11450 in? I understand if the answer is no. >> 😊 >> >> >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> >> *From:* Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 4:23 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* 6.6.2 Release >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> In light of [0], we need a 6.6.2 release as soon as possible. >> >> I'd like to volunteer to RM for this release, unless someone else wants >> to do so or has an objection. >> >> Regards, >> >> Ishan >> >> >> >> [0] - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/news.html#12-october-2017- >> please-secure-your-apache-solr-servers-since-a-zero-day- >> exploit-has-been-reported-on-a-public-mailing-list >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >> >> >> > >
