Update on the RC: I'm trying to build one for some time now. The latest situation is that all the steps seem to be going well, but still the script fails: https://gist.github.com/chatman/fa307c3e8253d2014d0e7bb381328396
Looking into what could be going wrong. Any help is most welcome. @Shalin, I remember you mentioned that you found a way to build the artifacts separately and signing them separately. Can you please share how to do so? It will save me a lot of time; currently each of my attempts is building artifacts from scratch. Thanks, Ishan On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! I ran precommit and test after the commit and all's well.... > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> No problem, I'll pick up your commit. :-) >> >> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Committed now. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Michael: Good catch. Have I mentioned lately that Git and I don't get >>>> along? Apparently I was in some weird state when I tried to push. >>>> >>>> Ishan: Many apologies, but I'll have to push again, is it too late to >>>> re-spin? >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Here are the logs of two failed runs, FYI. >>>>> http://textsearch.io/tests.log.gz (kernel: 4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64) >>>>> http://textsearch.io/tests2.log.gz (kernel: 4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64) >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> FYI, I've been struggling to run tests for past 4-5 hours. About >>>>>> 10-15 of them failed on every run; I tried all the branches, variety of >>>>>> different machines (Intel i7 Haswell-E, Ryzen 1700, Threadripper 1950X). >>>>>> My >>>>>> JDK version on all of these are 8u144. >>>>>> >>>>>> Finally, figured out that all my machines had the latest >>>>>> 4.12.14-300.fc26.x86_64 or 4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64 kernels. When I >>>>>> downgraded the kernel to 4.11.6-201.fc25.x86_64, the tests started >>>>>> running >>>>>> as usual. Now, I'll try to build the RC for 6.6.2 on this kernel. Is >>>>>> this a >>>>>> known issue? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Erick Erickson < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Done both for 6.6 and 6x >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure Erick, please go ahead. >>>>>>>> I'll start the release later today. >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Ishan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Erick Erickson < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ishan: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have 11297 ready to rock-n-roll, it's just a matter of pushing >>>>>>>>> it. Give me a few. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The thing I'm not clear on is what to do with CHANGES.txt. >>>>>>>>> Currently it's in 7.0.1 and 7.1. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I propose adding a 6.6.2 section to 6x and including it there and >>>>>>>>> leaving it in the 7.0.1 and 7.1 sections of master. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll do it that way, you can change it if you want unless I hear >>>>>>>>> back from you sooner. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Erick >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Allison, Timothy B. < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. Thank you! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *From:* Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 5:25 PM >>>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: 6.6.2 Release >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > Any chance we could get SOLR-11450 in? I understand if the >>>>>>>>>> answer is no. 😊 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Currently, I want to have this release out as soon as possible so >>>>>>>>>> as to mitigate the risk exposure of the security vulnerability. >>>>>>>>>> Since this >>>>>>>>>> is not committed yet, I'd vote for leaving this out and possibly >>>>>>>>>> having it >>>>>>>>>> included in a later release, if needed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 to SOLR-11297. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 2:32 AM, David Smiley < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Suggested criteria for bug-fix release issues: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * fixes a bug :-) and doesn't harm backwards-compatibility in >>>>>>>>>> the process >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * helps users upgrade to later versions >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * documentation >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 to SOLR-11297 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure on SOLR-11450. Seems it might introduce a >>>>>>>>>> back-compat issue? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:40 PM Erick Erickson < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'd also like to get SOLR-11297 in if there are no objections. >>>>>>>>>> Ditto if the answer is no.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's quite a safe fix though. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Allison, Timothy B. < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any chance we could get SOLR-11450 in? I understand if the >>>>>>>>>> answer is no. 😊 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *From:* Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 4:23 PM >>>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* 6.6.2 Release >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In light of [0], we need a 6.6.2 release as soon as possible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'd like to volunteer to RM for this release, unless someone else >>>>>>>>>> wants to do so or has an objection. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ishan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [0] - https://lucene.apache.org/solr >>>>>>>>>> /news.html#12-october-2017-please-secure-your-apache-solr-se >>>>>>>>>> rvers-since-a-zero-day-exploit-has-been-reported-on-a-public >>>>>>>>>> -mailing-list >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, >>>>>>>>>> Speaker >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >>>>>>>>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
