Michael: Good catch. Have I mentioned lately that Git and I don't get along? Apparently I was in some weird state when I tried to push.
Ishan: Many apologies, but I'll have to push again, is it too late to re-spin? On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < [email protected]> wrote: > Here are the logs of two failed runs, FYI. > http://textsearch.io/tests.log.gz (kernel: 4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64) > http://textsearch.io/tests2.log.gz (kernel: 4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64) > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> FYI, I've been struggling to run tests for past 4-5 hours. About 10-15 of >> them failed on every run; I tried all the branches, variety of different >> machines (Intel i7 Haswell-E, Ryzen 1700, Threadripper 1950X). My JDK >> version on all of these are 8u144. >> >> Finally, figured out that all my machines had the latest >> 4.12.14-300.fc26.x86_64 or 4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64 kernels. When I >> downgraded the kernel to 4.11.6-201.fc25.x86_64, the tests started running >> as usual. Now, I'll try to build the RC for 6.6.2 on this kernel. Is this a >> known issue? >> >> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Done both for 6.6 and 6x >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Sure Erick, please go ahead. >>>> I'll start the release later today. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ishan >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Erick Erickson < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ishan: >>>>> >>>>> I have 11297 ready to rock-n-roll, it's just a matter of pushing it. >>>>> Give me a few. >>>>> >>>>> The thing I'm not clear on is what to do with CHANGES.txt. Currently >>>>> it's in 7.0.1 and 7.1. >>>>> >>>>> I propose adding a 6.6.2 section to 6x and including it there and >>>>> leaving it in the 7.0.1 and 7.1 sections of master. >>>>> >>>>> I'll do it that way, you can change it if you want unless I hear back >>>>> from you sooner. >>>>> >>>>> Erick >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Allison, Timothy B. < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sounds good. Thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 5:25 PM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: 6.6.2 Release >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > Any chance we could get SOLR-11450 in? I understand if the answer >>>>>> is no. 😊 >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently, I want to have this release out as soon as possible so as >>>>>> to mitigate the risk exposure of the security vulnerability. Since this >>>>>> is >>>>>> not committed yet, I'd vote for leaving this out and possibly having it >>>>>> included in a later release, if needed. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 to SOLR-11297. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 2:32 AM, David Smiley < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Suggested criteria for bug-fix release issues: >>>>>> >>>>>> * fixes a bug :-) and doesn't harm backwards-compatibility in the >>>>>> process >>>>>> >>>>>> * helps users upgrade to later versions >>>>>> >>>>>> * documentation >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 to SOLR-11297 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure on SOLR-11450. Seems it might introduce a back-compat >>>>>> issue? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:40 PM Erick Erickson < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd also like to get SOLR-11297 in if there are no objections. Ditto >>>>>> if the answer is no.... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's quite a safe fix though. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Allison, Timothy B. < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Any chance we could get SOLR-11450 in? I understand if the answer is >>>>>> no. 😊 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 4:23 PM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Subject:* 6.6.2 Release >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> In light of [0], we need a 6.6.2 release as soon as possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to volunteer to RM for this release, unless someone else >>>>>> wants to do so or has an objection. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Ishan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [0] - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/news.html#12-october-2017-ple >>>>>> ase-secure-your-apache-solr-servers-since-a-zero-day-exploit >>>>>> -has-been-reported-on-a-public-mailing-list >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >>>>>> >>>>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >>>>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
